MYTH #2: 'Recent Global Temperature Rise Has Been Dramatic.'



THE ENVIROTRUTH: Dr. Tim Patterson, professor of earth sciences at Carleton University and others show that in the past thousand years, there were periods much warmer and colder than today, long before we began burning significant quantities of fossil fuels. (An important March 2003 Harvard University announcement confirms this). The following graph puts this in perspective (NOTE: The Sargaso Sea is a two million square mile ellipse in the North Atlantic that has been studied for centuries - its temperature variations generally indicate global trends and agree with the even longer (6,000 year) Chinese peat bog records.):
 


Source: Kegwin, L. D. (1996) Science 274, 1504-1508.

From about 900 to 1300 AD, during the Medieval Warm Period, the Earth was warmer than it is today. In the 20th Century the global average surface temperature rose about 0.7oC, after a five hundred year cool period called the Little Ice Age. Only the 20th Century warming trend may have a human component attributable to fossil fuel use, which increased sharply after 1940. A closer look at the 20th century temperature record shows three distinct trends: First, a warming trend of about 0.5oC began in the late 19th century and peaked around 1940. Next, temperature decreased from 1940 until the late 1970's - fears of a coming glacial period dominated during the '70s when Iceland's fisheries were destroyed by advancing sea ice, winters in North America were unusually cold and it was first realized that global temperatures had fallen steadily between 1940 and 1975. Then a third warming trend occurred from 1976 to 1986, after which the increase becomes very small. The largest portion of the warming for the second half of the 20th century was limited mainly to winter in the coldest continental air masses of Siberia and northwestern North America.

So where do environmental groups get the idea that our planet has warmed dramatically in recent decades? The answer is simple - they are using the wrong data. Instead of citing modern, accurate, space-based measurements, they quote error-prone, ground-based temperature readings that give little indication of true global trends.

Until recently the best we could do to estimate the Earth's overall temperature was to average data collected at ground stations around the globe. These readings are notoriously inaccurate as most of them come from developing countries that do not properly maintain their stations or records. In addition, there are two other problems with data collected at the Earth's surface.

First, nearly all of these stations are land-based, even though three quarters of our planet is covered with water. There are far too few temperature-sensing buoys deployed at sea to give an even remotely accurate assessment of atmospheric temperature trends in these vast areas. This is especially significant in the Southern Hemisphere, which is 90 percent ocean.

Second, urban sprawl has enveloped many temperature sensing stations in "heat islands" significantly warmer that the surrounding countryside. The warming measured at these sites is therefore problematic in determining global trends.

The only way to properly take the planet's temperature is to use sophisticated space-based sensors mounted aboard Earth-orbiting satellites. Dr. Tim Patterson, Dr. Pat Michaels, professor of climatology at the University of Virginia, Dr. John Christy, Professor and Director, Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama, and many others explain that these far more accurate and comprehensive satellite temperature sensors reveal a statistically significant, but very small, temperature rise since measurements began in 1979. Dr. Christy says the trend is about 0.07oC per decade, right at the edge of statistical significance and certainly far too small to be noticeable.

Here is a temperature plot which show the variation in temperatures as calculated from satellite measurements:

 

The following graph, from a somewhat different source, shows the difference between surface and satellite measurements:


 


Source: Prepared by John L. Daly (www.john-daly.com) from raw data from the Earth System Science Laboratory at the University of Alabama - Huntsville and the GISS.


With the exception of the recent El Niño warming event (temperatures quickly dropped to normal), both balloon and satellite data have shown only a minute rise in the planet's average temperature over the past two decades.

In the final analysis, the Earth is warming ... and it is getting colder … and it is staying the same. It all depends on what time frame you are speaking about and where (and how) you look.

Return to Myths page