In one of my columns I wrote about the junk science used to justify the phony environmental scare tactics used by the New Communist Movement (NCM) to terrorize and intimidate Americans into a socialist state. (By, NCM, of course, I refer to the misnamed “environmentalist” movement.) I ended the column by stating that these “environmentalists” were using their “concern” for the environment as a Trojan Horse. I’ll explain:
About 25 years ago I read an article in Time Magazine about the dismal failures and imminent collapse of socialism /communism. The article concluded with a caution to the reader against making the wrong assumption that this dreadful cult of socialism/communism was going to go quietly into the night. There were already plans afoot by these same old true believers; and that was the re-identification of their movement in order to change its image. The author ended the piece by telling the reader to look for the word “environment” a lot in the future.
They knew communism/socialism was, of course, indefensible due to overwhelming empirical evidence showing it an abject failure. (And the most heinous scheme ever devised by man.) Although there is really no difference between the two movements, socialism/communism had made fascism look like child’s play when it came to human suffering. Thus they (I must admit, brilliantly) decided to hide behind a fraudulent global environmental crisis as a means to further their quest for world government. Thus the socialist/communist movement became the “environmentalist” movement; sort of a neo-fascist wolf in sheep’s clothing.
The founders of the NCM were smart enough to know that if they could convince you that what you were doing was harmful to the globe then they could create a “new way” (read slavery) for you to live. In order to accomplish this they needed a modern day Trojan Horse, and they found it in the United Nations (UN). I t was easy for the NCM to build a vast supporting cast from the willing fools with which the UN is so replete. One of the most dangerous results of this UN takeover was the adoption of what is called Agenda 21 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil back in 1992.
Agenda 21 defines what is, without a doubt, one of the most clever and duplicitous blueprints for world slavery in the history of man. It is much too complex to cover in a newspaper column so I will not try.
However, one direct result of this UN abetted NCM scheme is a whole new set of terms that have crept into our lexicon. I’m sure you have been exposed to most of them. Such terms as sustainable development, sustainable communities, green space, smart growth, biodiversity, urban boundaries, open space, wildlife habitats, urban sprawl and many others have become code words for this new fascism.
Two of the most perfidious of these terms are sustainable communities and smart growth. They sound like and are presented as harmless and necessary community previsions; but they are neither. And Fayetteville, along with most other local communities, is being “planned” under this one-world government agenda through “sustainable communities” or “smart growth” directives and agendas.
And a new mechanism of government has been developed to push through this radical “New World” agenda. It goes by several terms including “The Third Sector” or “Civil Society” or “Human Planning Consensus”. But, no matter what it is called, it is the same thing; a UN invented process through which public policy is formulated by non-elected individuals who are insulated from and therefore unencumbered by any electoral or Constitutional restraints.
Most people in this area (including our own elected city officials) are not aware of how much they are being controlled by the United Nations. How do I know this? Easy. Fayetteville has a “planning commission”. If a city has an organized “planning” coterie that takes its marching orders from the American Planning Association (APA), then the NCM through their puppets in the APA are covertly governing that city. The APA is a collection of socialist/fascists who do not believe you should have any choice in where you live or for that matter to even own property. (Impact Taxes are one of their chosen methods.) Read the following excerpt from the APA’s Policy Guide on Planning for Sustainability: “City and regional planning is integrally related to defining how, where, and when human development occurs…”. (Emphasis added)
A “sustainable community” is, according to the APA, a highly condensed urban “human village” or “settlement” of high-rise communes bereft of modern day conveniences. They plan on being the herders and we are to be the herdees, if I may.
Example: How many times have you heard the term “walkable city” used with reference to Fayetteville? Sounds nice, right? Kids walking to school, families walking the neighborhood, walking “trails” for everybody…oh wow, yummy! If anybody living in Fayetteville thinks that the term “walkable city” used by our local planners, means anything like that bucolic vision, they are wrong.
Do you think that your Fayetteville city government is wasting all your hard earned money on destinationless sidewalks and cow paths instead of on our streets because these things are nice amenities? No! The “walkable” city your local “planners” have in mind is a city in which you walk. Period! Their plans do not consider streets desirable. Nor do they want any more internal-combustion engines. (Just this week the Mayor announced that “we” do not have enough money for street improvement. He didn’t say “we” didn’t have enough money to build never-used sidewalks and “trails”.)
Read what the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's "Community Sustainability: Agendas for Choice-making & Action." document says: (Again, emphasis added) "In America, today's community options favor cars rather than people. Looking ahead, for most communities' transit, walking and bikes (must) become people's preferred choices. . ." and “. . . we will see all settlements linked up by extensive bike, recreation and agro-forestry E-ways (environment-ways); . .”
And let me quote again from the American Planning Association: “1. The American Planning Association and its Chapters support planning policies and legislation that encourage alternatives to use of gas-powered vehicles.”
There you have it, folks; back to the future courtesy of your local “environmentalists” and “planners”. (Some people have predicted that these social “planners” may even go so far as to tell the American citizens that they cannot smoke on private property using some fraudulent “health” issue for a Trojan horse. It’s hard to think that they’re that power hungry, but who knows.)
Before I end this column I want to make you aware of one other skillfully used but equally as perverted term; the often-spouted phrase, “quality of life”. When you hear one of our local officials say he or she is doing something to “improve” or “maintain” the “quality of life” in Fayetteville be reminded that that person is involved already in a United Nation plan to destroy that very quality.